12239339_543363462483394_3818044758793338840_o

“What is couture if not absolutely bespoke, both in make as well as concept?” – Varun Bahl Photo Credit: ELLE India November 2015

COPYRIGHT IN EMBELLISHMENTS, ORNAMENTATION, AND TEXTILES

I was blown away when I visited Varun Bahl‘s studio in Delhi, India in 2011.  It was mesmerizing to see up close the details of the hand embroidery, beadwork, and embellishments that make up so many of his designs.  Varun is a true couturier. Nothing is mass-produced – it wouldn’t be possible with the level of intricacy in the textiles. And the good thing is,  textiles and patterns are among those fashion design elements – some of the few – that are almost universally protected by intellectual property laws.

India is one of the world’s leading producers of textiles-the sixth largest global exporter of textiles in the world.  India’s Copyright Act (1957) and the Design Act (2000) collectively give the guidelines for copyright protection for designs and textiles, as well as geographical indication protection for some textiles. Like many other jurisdictions, registration of a textile design in India is strongly encouraged to secure protection and reduce potential liability from or opposition by another party.

And although many countries offer copyright protection for fashion garments in their entirety, the United States does not. Various legislators and members of the fashion industry have worked tirelessly to gain support for the Innovative Design Protection Act (IDPA), a proposed amendment to the Copyright Act that would give US copyright protection for full fashion designs, expanding on the current US protection that only extends to certain elements of the designs. By doing so, the US protection of fashion designs would reach a level of protection comparable to many European and Asian countries, India included.

12341055_548226518663755_1428232758375711798_n

Photo Credit: Harper’s Bazaar Bride India

Varun can rest easy in the knowledge that many of the unique and amazing features of his garments rightfully enjoy strong protection globally.  Fashion designs are not protected equally around the world but textiles are given almost universal proteciton.

If you’d like to know more about how to protect and/or register your copyright for designs or textiles, contact me at layne@laynerandolph.com.

Thanks to Varun Bahl for his cooperation with this post. If you’d like to learn more about Varun Bahl and see more of his designs, you can find him on Facebook or at his website VARUN BAHL.  

Come Join the #1 Affiliate Network!

Afternoon_tea_in_style_JJR_for_LR_Oct_2013

Fashion illustration by Juan J. Rivera

What a great event hosted by BLACA and Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP in London!! I especially loved meeting all of the Queen Mary IP Masters students who “crashed” the event (I’m glad you did) and the London-based IP professionals who were so knowledgable and collaborative.  Thank you for hosting me and making me feel so welcome. Check out the BLACA website  for more information about the organization and check out my Facebook Page for upcoming photos.  Special thanks to Brigitte Lindner, Darrell Panethiere and Simon Clark!

 

Image

Speaking to students in the Queen Mary IP Masters program in London.

20131117-152945.jpg

Fashion Illustration by Juan J. Rivera

Celebrate for Coco!! November 18 is the 89th anniversary of one of the most famous trademarks in beauty/fashion: CHANEL. Although used in commerce in the US as early as 1920, the company filed its US trademark application for CHANEL and the interlocked CC associated with cosmetics and toiletries on November 18, 1924. And the rest is history.

664430_10151236832409879_1244370714_o copy

Monisha Raja, Owner of “Love is Mighty”

Monisha Raja’s “Love is Mighty” brand embodies what she calls “”compassionate living”.  Not only are the shoes and handbags made of vegan and often recycled materials, but her Indian production operation employs Indian women from local tribes who are keeping their ancient crafts alive and providing for their families as well.  Picture vibrant textured clutches made from vintage saris, and sandals made with intricate hand beading.  The shoes and bags are not only beautiful, every item is necessarily a one-of-a-kind.

When asked if she had any concerns about competitors’ attempts to copy her concept or even her products, Monisha says she tries not to rely too heavily on intellectual property protections.  She knows that the fashion business is fast-paced and that some designers are quick to cut corners to capitalize on it.  But she feels that increased protection such as the proposed Innovative Design Protection Act could be “a hindrance for the designer, causing him/her to be overly cautious.” Monisha Raja strongly feels that while there may be clear instances of glaring intellectual property infringement involving misappropriation of a logo or a trademarked label, legal protection for design must stay flexible so as not to stifle creativity. 

Monisha explains that she owes much of her design inspiration to Issey Miyake and Dries Van Noten and shares that in the years following her education at Parsons School of Design, their work influenced her approach to design. She worked for Miyake and through that experience gained a deep appreciation for his textiles and designs.  As she transitioned to shoe design she tried to capture the overall feel of Miyake’s work. But, as she makes clear, nothing in her collection makes an express reference to Miyake.  Instead, his work inspired her to build on her natural instincts and create her own brand of design.

So, Monisha doesn’t spend time worrying if others are trying to copy her.  Instead, she protects the artisanal work that makes the Love Is Mighty brand so strong, by maintaining loyal relationships with suppliers and the local artisans in India.  

HEERAvariations

The Heera shoe, a “Love is Mighty” bestseller.

The Heera shoe, made of recycled biscuit wrappers, has been such a bestseller that she recently declined an investment proposed by a large shoe manufacturing company that offered to expand her business via manufacturing in China. In her opinion, this would have been the antithesis of her company’s principles. It’s the handwork, stitching and beading that make her products special and it’s the story behind her label that makes the Love is Mighty brand as memorable as it is inspiring.

Layne Randolph, Esq. and Juan J. Rivera would like to thank Monisha Raja for her participation; we wish her much continued success with her growing company.

 

 

 

June_2013_JJR_Illustration_LR_Esq_Website_Graphic_2Trademark litigation has captured the attention of the fashion industry once again following Christian Louboutin’s recently filed charges in the Southern District of New York late last month, which alleges trademark infringement against Alba Footwear and Easy Pickins, the primary named defendants in a complaint submitted by Harvey Lewin, Esq., counsel for Christian Louboutin, and the more recent Louboutin v. Charles Jourdan case. The charges have raised questions about the future and direction of the federal circuit court’s outlook on Louboutin’s trademark infringement case in 2012, which culminated with the Second Federal Circuit Court ruling that Louboutin’s signature red soles could be protected under “certain circumstances” when the red soles contrast with the rest of the shoe. As the fashion and legal worlds now anxiously await developments in this new case, designers and fashion companies have mixed reactions to these recent cases in light of business pressures and potential “limitations” on creativity for those who wish to assure a competitive edge in an industry that relies on novelty.  In sum, it proposes an unprecedented challenge on the creative and business/legal ends of the industry. Aside from establishing trends or redefining new classics in fashion, developing unique products also has legal ramifications. The creative world in the fashion industry must also be concerned with how the impact of trademark protection for these goods will prospectively secure their longevity, business strength, and popularity with consumers. The answer lies, in part, in how the public values and understands these products. As fashion companies strive to keep their collections and products fresh and enlivened with a unique character, consumers’ appreciation for these goods touches on the legal concept of distinctiveness.   We will discuss distinctiveness in fashion law in upcoming posts in our DESIGNER SERIES, starting next week. Stay tuned.